London, ON
Methods
Eighteen
cadaveric hemipelvis specimens were randomly assigned to receive a
hemispherical cup, a dual geometry cup, or a spiked cup. An experienced team prepared the
specimens and implanted the acetabular cups. A custom CT platform was designed to optimize imaging of the
acetabular cups. After cup
implantation, specimens were mounted on the platform and imaged in a spiral CT
scanner. Contact analysis was
performed using custom-developed imaging software.
Results
The mean
amount of cup contact was 48.6 % in the hemisphere group, 31.9 % in the dual
geometry group, and 35.1 % in the spiked group (ANOVA p 0.05). A comparison between the groups for
amount and distribution of contact was performed.
Discussion
and Conclusion
This study
outlines a novel CT analysis technique to evaluate
bone-prosthesis contact for cementless acetabular cups. The hemisphere, dual geometry, and spiked designs analyzed
using this CT analysis technique demonstrate differences in the amount and
distribution of bone prosthesis contact.